<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Cascade&#8221;: Q&amp;A with David Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicalanalyst.com/2009/10/01/cascade-qa-with-david-wright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalanalyst.com/2009/10/01/cascade-qa-with-david-wright/</link>
	<description>Practical Insight for Business Analysts and Project Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://practicalanalyst.com/2009/10/01/cascade-qa-with-david-wright/comment-page-1/#comment-6733</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalanalyst.com/?p=2084#comment-6733</guid>
		<description>Well said, Doug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Doug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougGtheBA</title>
		<link>http://practicalanalyst.com/2009/10/01/cascade-qa-with-david-wright/comment-page-1/#comment-6732</link>
		<dc:creator>DougGtheBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalanalyst.com/?p=2084#comment-6732</guid>
		<description>Read it, liked it and keep it on my desk at work. That should tell you something right there. It&#039;s a good read and well worth a new look at an old problem. Thanks to you both for reviewing it....now I have to go read it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read it, liked it and keep it on my desk at work. That should tell you something right there. It&#8217;s a good read and well worth a new look at an old problem. Thanks to you both for reviewing it&#8230;.now I have to go read it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
