<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JB Weekly Digest (07-42)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicalanalyst.com/2007/10/26/friday-digest-102607/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalanalyst.com/2007/10/26/friday-digest-102607/</link>
	<description>Practical Insight for Business Analysts and Project Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://practicalanalyst.com/2007/10/26/friday-digest-102607/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanbabcock.com/2007/10/26/friday-digest-102607/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by, Scott. I appreciate the comment.

Your point is well taken. I agree that we don&#039;t want developers testing their own code just as we wouldn&#039;t want the BA reviewing his/her own specs.

There are situations where project team members can temporarily switch to carry out other roles to get a project out of a bind, though.

While I won&#039;t put words into his mouth - I think that is the general idea Bill was trying to convey. At least that&#039;s what I took from his post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by, Scott. I appreciate the comment.</p>
<p>Your point is well taken. I agree that we don&#8217;t want developers testing their own code just as we wouldn&#8217;t want the BA reviewing his/her own specs.</p>
<p>There are situations where project team members can temporarily switch to carry out other roles to get a project out of a bind, though.</p>
<p>While I won&#8217;t put words into his mouth &#8211; I think that is the general idea Bill was trying to convey. At least that&#8217;s what I took from his post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://practicalanalyst.com/2007/10/26/friday-digest-102607/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanbabcock.com/2007/10/26/friday-digest-102607/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>The quote you have from Bill Miller reads &quot;If you need developers to test, then they put their QA hats on to test&quot;
It is absurd to suggest that even hardworking, ethical developers can test their own code. They can and should do integration and &quot;happy path&quot; testing - but that is nothing like QA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote you have from Bill Miller reads &#8220;If you need developers to test, then they put their QA hats on to test&#8221;<br />
It is absurd to suggest that even hardworking, ethical developers can test their own code. They can and should do integration and &#8220;happy path&#8221; testing &#8211; but that is nothing like QA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
